Problem connecting to adch
Moderator: Moderators
Problem connecting to adch
Having trouble connecting to the adchpp. Other people can get in fine, but when i connect i have to either use localhost or my lanip addy.
When using my external i get
[17:46:46] *** No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.
When using localhost
[17:45:01] *** Connecting to adc://127.0.0.1:2780...
[17:45:01] *** Connected
[17:45:01] <ADCH> Your ip is 127.0.0.1
[17:45:01] *** An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
Lanip (192.168.0.1) gives something very similar to that. Any ideas ?
When using my external i get
[17:46:46] *** No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.
When using localhost
[17:45:01] *** Connecting to adc://127.0.0.1:2780...
[17:45:01] *** Connected
[17:45:01] <ADCH> Your ip is 127.0.0.1
[17:45:01] *** An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
Lanip (192.168.0.1) gives something very similar to that. Any ideas ?
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
Oh my, sorry, I had this problem myself, but I didn't recognize it from your initial description (which should have been enough). Since you're NATed, you've probably force an IP in DC++. This IP won't match what adch++ sees you connecting with, so it disconnects you. Maybe one of the lua gurus can script around this behavior - it's why NMDC hubs have exceptions to the IP checking.
Simple patch to sort it.
Code: Select all
Index: adchpp/trunk/adchpp/ClientManager.cpp
===================================================================
--- adchpp/trunk/adchpp/ClientManager.cpp (revision 86)
+++ adchpp/trunk/adchpp/ClientManager.cpp (working copy)
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
for(StringIter j = cmd.getParameters().begin(); j != cmd.getParameters().end(); ++j) {
if(j->compare(0, 2, "I4") == 0) {
dcdebug("%s verifying ip\n", AdcCommand::fromSID(c.getSID()).c_str());
- if(j->size() == 2) {
+ if(j->size() == 2 || (c.getIp() == "127.0.0.1")) {
// Clearing is ok
} else if(j->compare(2, j->size()-2, "0.0.0.0") == 0) {
c.setField("I4", c.getIp());
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
That's why i initially suggested adding some settings for it. Decided against doing it that way for now, since i figured querying the xml everytime an IP wanted checking might decrease performance.
Obviously that patch can be modded to permit specified lan ip's easy enough for other people, but i figure that'll do me for now, until a nicer way turns up.
Suggestions are welcome, and i'll have a go at doing some.
Obviously that patch can be modded to permit specified lan ip's easy enough for other people, but i figure that'll do me for now, until a nicer way turns up.
Suggestions are welcome, and i'll have a go at doing some.
I guess I need this patch because I can't join my own hub:
[18:49:49] *** Connecting to adc://127.0.0.1:2780...
[18:49:49] *** Connected
[18:49:50] Your ip is 127.0.0.1
[18:49:50] *** An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
How can a retard like me get in his own hub?
BTW cheers very much Pothead, other people are able to join, so I assume it's working well.
[18:49:49] *** Connecting to adc://127.0.0.1:2780...
[18:49:49] *** Connected
[18:49:50] Your ip is 127.0.0.1
[18:49:50] *** An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
How can a retard like me get in his own hub?
BTW cheers very much Pothead, other people are able to join, so I assume it's working well.
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."
Thanks mate, you are very kind, it's working. I guess most of this will require plugins, but is there a way to register for the hublist, and to add Ops, and to create an MOTD, and to set min share/max hubs?
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."
You can register on the adc hublist website.
How i sorted Op accounts out was using the !regme command, then manually editing the users.txt file. Probably a better way in access.lua.
I sure there is some way to set MOTD, not cannot think of it at the moment.
No idea about min share / max hubs, again worth looking through the adchpp.xml and access.lua files.
How i sorted Op accounts out was using the !regme command, then manually editing the users.txt file. Probably a better way in access.lua.
I sure there is some way to set MOTD, not cannot think of it at the moment.
No idea about min share / max hubs, again worth looking through the adchpp.xml and access.lua files.
I tried at http://www.adchublist.org/?p=addhub using hubaddress:portnumber and adc://hubaddress:portnumber
and got:
The hub in address <hub> didn't answer. Maybe there is no hub or the hub is full. Check the address and try again.
Error 110: Connection timed out
Sod it. Anyway, cheers for your other help once again
and got:
The hub in address <hub> didn't answer. Maybe there is no hub or the hub is full. Check the address and try again.
Error 110: Connection timed out
Sod it. Anyway, cheers for your other help once again
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."
imb wrote:I tried at http://www.adchublist.org/?p=addhub using hubaddress:portnumber and adc://hubaddress:portnumber
and got:
The hub in address <hub> didn't answer. Maybe there is no hub or the hub is full. Check the address and try again.
Error 110: Connection timed out
ditto
This is a shambles really. They're promoting ADC, no make that imposing ADC, when ADC isn't sufficiently ready. If you get the hubsoft running, only lord knows how to get on the hublist, this is reflected by the some 6 hubs still on the adchublist.org. As this hublist isn't in the main client it doesn't matter anyway since no one will connect to your hub. and all the while your DC hub decline further and further, 111 users in it at the moment, it used to be more than double that at this time. Shit happens, but these policies are blatantly absurd and are slowly but surely destroying DC.
Enjoy your ADC network with 6 hubs and a bunch of fucked over DC hub owners.
Enjoy your ADC network with 6 hubs and a bunch of fucked over DC hub owners.
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."
And this problem is further perpetuated by an issue that can easily be solved, by removing the monopoly powers of the default hublists. DC has been at the mercy of hublists since the dawn of DC++, and still the issue hasn't been resolved once and for all. Absolutely pathetic.
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
Generally hub owners and users don't care about hublist and dcdev politics, aslong as they have a hublist that works.
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."
well I think they should, its important we all think about whats best for the future and also stand by our morals. Its also good to support the people that spend all this time and effort coding and running services for us. Otherwise we would still be using original NMDC (and most likely have disappeared into obscurity many years ago).
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
Sure there has to be the correct balance between morals and practicalities. But these policies have little to do with morals, more with pushing a protocol forward prematurely and favouritism in terms of which hublists to display. and in terms of non xml hublists apparently it's better to have no hublist than a non xml one.newborn wrote:well I think they should, its important we all think about whats best for the future and also stand by our morals. Its also good to support the people that spend all this time and effort coding and running services for us. Otherwise we would still be using original NMDC (and most likely have disappeared into obscurity many years ago).
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."
Sorry I don't understand, am I supposed to be some kind of advocate of adchublist.org?GargoyleMT wrote:adchublist.org failed to register your ADC hub. Isn't that a problem?imb wrote:Generally hub owners and users don't care about hublist and dcdev politics, aslong as they have a hublist that works.
"Every Englishman must have a hobby. Some like to collect the stamp, some like to make the jam, but the most fun is to a kill a little animal with a shotgun or rip them up with wild dog."