DC++k

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-07 06:22

MaZaKa98:
The problem with doing this is that it is yet another string list I would have to create and do stuff with (including saving and loading).
This is a feature that is "nice to have", but which really should be implemented in DC++ (so that I would not have to patch it to the latest version all the time).
This feature will have to be coded by someone else, I'm afraid, as I am a little "burnt out" by DC++k at the moment.

cyberal & R200:
(stupid question time from me)
You do have the "Show share checked users" feature enabled?

A fix for the crash bug is rebuilding as I type this.
The reason I didn't detect this was that I built the previous version without access to the 'net (running a DC Hub for 2 clients on my own computer).
It "Worked On My Computer (tm)"!

Sarf
---
The computer is stronger than the pen, the sword, and usually, the programmer.

[MASTER]Spookie · Post by **[MASTER]Spookie** » 2003-07-07 07:19

hey Sarf

Great work , mldonkey is gone

dc++k2 in settings great

but

Nice word

lot of runtime errors, abnormal terminations
canÃ‚Â´t send you bugreport, 2 old operative system

Spookie

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-07 07:21

Changelog:

Code: Select all

 -- 0.251055981k --
* Fixed some crash bugs in the hub window
   thanks to R200 for reporting this!
* ML Donkey is impossible to remove from the user list
   or so it seems - sorry everyone
* KNOWN BUG - DC++k will not always disconnect from checked users as it 
   should - this is a KNOWN BUG
* My ISP is going up and down like a jojo
   gaaaaaaaaah!

I give up. I can't force DC++ to remove the ML Donkey entries. Perhaps all that is needed is a refresh or something, but I can't even delete the ML Donkey entries using very low level functions. The options to remove the donkey clients are still there, but they give very little effect. Suggested action is fix the problem in the hubsoft (which may be that ML Donkey clients do not exude $Quit or something) or just create a huge IP list so we can erase and DESTROY all evil ML Donkey clients.

If anyone have any suggestions on how to do this (WITH C++ example code that WORKS), please mail me about it.

<sigh>

Well, at least it doesn't crash any more.

Sarf
---
The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-07 07:33

sarf wrote:cyberal & R200:
(stupid question time from me)
You do have the "Show share checked users" feature enabled?

aaah, what a stupid question

yes, I have it enabled!
When the whole hub has been checked (900 users), maybe 20 has the green C.

about this MLdonkey problem, we have no problems with MLdonkey in our hub which is a 100 GB hub, maybe MLdonkey always share 11 GB? aah, anyways... I have however noticed other users getting stuck now and then, don't really bother me BUT I can't do a "refresh filelist" since that will trigger "check new users" on EVERYONE! ... THAT however is kinda irritating.. not an important problem anyhow.. k does it's job!!

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-07 07:36

cyberal wrote:BUT I can't do a "refresh filelist"

"refresh userlist"

OLDoMiNiON · Post by **OLDoMiNiON** » 2003-07-07 09:36

Latest version of DC++k seems to take tonnes of CPU.. i can't tun it.. :-S

1.7 Athlon XP
768MB SDRAM
Win2k

OLDoMiNiON · Post by **OLDoMiNiON** » 2003-07-07 09:37

turn it on*

[MASTER]Spookie · Post by **[MASTER]Spookie** » 2003-07-07 09:50

no cpu trobles here

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-07 10:22

seems to occur when a pm is recieved!
same here, tons of cpu, app freezes... force close..

[PT]Devilishly · Post by **[PT]Devilishly** » 2003-07-07 10:33

Could it be possible adding in the Ã¢â‚¬Å“adl SearchÃ¢â‚¬? for forbidden files the ability to have in it, for any file which we entered there, the possibility to define %[cheatingdescription] for it? Like it could be added a new tab Ã¢â‚¬Å“DescriptionÃ¢â‚¬? and when a user were caught with that file, the %[cheatingdescription] would be that parameter.

Keep up the great work,
[PT]Devilishly

clint_moin · Post by **clint_moin** » 2003-07-07 10:43

Yes same here. It freezes all the time.

Finished download messages don't seem to disappear and the userlist is not updated after a kick.

After re-opening it about 20 times today now my hubs are *** Unknown address.

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-07 10:44

[PT]Devilishly:
No, that is not possible since the share checker does not know anything about the ADL Search other than the fact that it puts files in the <<<Forbiddiden Files>>> directory.

Checking into PM = CPU freeze. Probably due to how I did the Ignore PM thingies.

Nope, refresh userlist is patched. If it is not patched, then ALL information about users will be lost upon refreshing. People thought that was undesirable. Thus my solution.

Checking into these errors.

Sarf
---
We must believe in luck. For how else can we explain the success of those we don't like?

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-07 11:34

Changelog :

Code: Select all

 -- 0.251055982k --
* Removed debugging info
   thanks clint_moin
* Removed some code from the ML Donkey thing that could affect the user
   list - other than this, there is not much I can do
* Removed the PM changes I made earlier
   thanks everyone that reported this!
* Hopefully works OK, otherwise use a working DC++k at this address :
   http://www.fukt.bth.se/~k/dcpp/working/
* KNOWN BUG - forbidden files might not always be - reason unknown -
   for me to fix this I need two things - the filelist and the ADL 
   Search parameters you used - mail them to me

There. This should help a bit. If not, then...
WHAT I TELL YOU THREE TIMES IS TRUE! WHAT I TELL YOU THREE TIMES IS TRUE! WHAT I TELL YOU THREE TIMES IS TRUE!

Mail your suggestions/bug reports to me. I receive a mail for every PM you send me anyhow, so it might as well be accessible to me while my 'net connection goes up and down (as it has for the last 24 hours).

Sorry to be an arse about this, but I do not want this thread to be cluttered up with bug reports that are more or less useful. While I do appreciate the psychological effect of posting about your problems and getting them fixed (sooner or later

), I get stressed out when I see eight messages all detailing the same problem (essentially).

Sarf
---
When a man talks dirty to a woman, it's sexual harassment. When a woman talks dirty to a man, it's $3.95 per minute.

powerup25 · Post by **powerup25** » 2003-07-07 13:46

Last versions of DC++k don't update properly the userlist after a user has leaved the hub, can you fix it?.
Another way to fake will go to you by mail this night so you can add a feature to DC++k, the solution seems to be easy, if you make some code for this one, it would be nice that you send the code to theduck, perhaps he can include the patch in DC++, i discover this one by casuality
Byesss.

OLDoMiNiON · Post by **OLDoMiNiON** » 2003-07-07 14:12

ok sarf - i'll email you from now on..

yup same userlist bug here.

Sedulus · Post by **Sedulus** » 2003-07-07 15:16

ah.. just when this thread was reaching the skies ;)

Most Active Topics
Rank Replies Topic
1 264 DC++k
2 186 Upload Speed Limiting
3 115 Auto 1 slot to each hub a user is in
4 82 0.232
5 78 Ratings server and protocol
6 72 The DC Network Infultrated!!!!!!
7 72 Distributed DC network
8 65 Adding file hashes to the protocol
9 62 mp3 bitrate
10 58 Noticing lots of visits from "s0.mediaforce.bbnplanet.n

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-07 17:39

New version. Hope this one works to your satisfaction.
Changelog :

Code: Select all

 -- 0.251055983k --
* Added "dirty user refresh" command
   can be used in user commands and manually
   can also be enabled in the settings
    will consume bandwidth if enabled (duh!)
   if so it is sent every five minutes
    thanks Atomic Jo for helping me with this one!
* Added command to do a manual "dirty user refresh"
   the command is /dodirtyuserrefresh 
    (aliases can be found in /help)
   thanks to Atomic Jo for this one too

Sarf
---
Anybody got any itch cream?

Atomic Jo · Post by **Atomic Jo** » 2003-07-07 21:20

You can use the mirror site I host to find this latest version, because Sarf seems to have still problems with his ISP. Hope tomorrow it will be ok.

Note 1: don't use the PDB files, it's for 0.251055982 version.
Note 2: Just check in my profile to find URL (or see sarf's site).

XeroXâ„¢ · Post by **XeroXâ„¢** » 2003-07-08 04:01

I enabled the Dirty user refresh feature .. it did nothing .. but after i rebooted. It spammed every OP in the hubs im in with this message:

[2003-07-08 09:44] <XeroXÃ¢â€žÂ¢> Hi there! I just wanted to tell you that I am fakesharing - I am so lame that I could not even remove this message. See you soon - and bring your kick-command!
[2003-07-08 09:44] <XeroXÃ¢â€žÂ¢> Hi there! I just wanted to tell you that I am fakesharing - I am so lame that I could not even remove this message. See you soon - and bring your kick-command!
[2003-07-08 09:44] <XeroXÃ¢â€žÂ¢> Hi there! I just wanted to tell you that I am fakesharing - I am so lame that I could not even remove this message. See you soon - and bring your kick-command!

Im not fake sharing to get straight
Im OP in 17 hubs .. so it spammed alot of OPs :evil:

Already emailed this to Sarf .. just thought i would warn the rest of you

XeroX

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-08 05:10

whats this?

did sarf maybe implement a anti-cheat feature in the client, nice one!

[PT]Devilishly · Post by **[PT]Devilishly** » 2003-07-08 05:40

If it works properly is a great feature

XeroXâ„¢ · Post by **XeroXâ„¢** » 2003-07-08 05:53

yeah but the feature is called Dirty user refresh and its supposed to refresh the userlist from mldonkey/hublist pingers etc (i think) .. if its an ani cheat feature shouldnt it be called Anti cheat ? And if it is anti cheat .. then it doesnt work cuz im not cheating (wouldnt be so fair to the cheaters i ban daily .. now would it) .. im not sharing but that has an different reason (RIAA, MediaForce etc) .. and i tested it while sharing and it still sends those messages. Yes anti cheat is nice .. but does it has to spam the OPs .. it send out 50 messages in maybe 2 minutes

XeroX

XeroXâ„¢ · Post by **XeroXâ„¢** » 2003-07-08 05:56

Double Post

it send out 50 messages in maybe 2 minutes

And that is for each OP

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-08 06:30

The anti fake is not related to the "Dirty user refresh" (or rather, it should not be).

Due to the old settings bug, you might have activated fakesharing without being aware of it (yes, fakesharing is present in DC++k, but as you can see, it is reported).

Oops. It was a bug in the dirty user refresh (it was not present in the SettingsManager.cpp, thus making DC++k wonky).

Oh well.

I updated the version available online.

Sarf
---
Impressive; but how big's your dick?

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-08 06:31

well, if there is an "anti-cheat" feature in DC++k it probably shouldn't be visible at all, maybe sarf accidently changed someting poking around in the code.. ?

btw, this kinda thing skould be implemented in DC++, the client cheat-checks itself =) neat!

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-08 06:50

sarf: Why not remove ALL cheat content from the client? Make it 100% honest!

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-08 07:22

Because it is hard to check for specific ways to fakeshare without being able to test it myself (currently doing some testing with the "same directory over and over again"-cheat).

Doing a new version now that does not go wacko on the userlist.

I hope I get it done before deadline (leaving my home for a few days), but otherways, go to the working DC++k client directory :
http://www.fukt.bth.se/~k/dcpp/working/

Sarf
---
Let a fool hold his tongue and he will pass for a sage.

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-08 07:55

New version out (last for a couple of days).
Changelog:

Code: Select all

 -- 0.251055984k --
* Fixed the 0 bytes nick list bug
   I have to remember to test my new versions myself sometime
   actually, this might still do wrong, but in those situations
   it should not matter
    thanks to NipponPippon for reporting this
* Fixed the "dirty user refresh meant fakesharing" bug  
   thanks to all who reported this!
* Added a temporary patch for the reported commands

Sarf
---
Ewige Blumenkraft!

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-08 12:17

weee.. I have green C's everywhere!
thanks sarf!

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-08 12:40

sarf wrote:currently doing some testing with the "same directory over and over again"-cheat

Sweet!

[MASTER]Spookie · Post by **[MASTER]Spookie** » 2003-07-08 12:54

hey

last version is not working for me at all.
when i logg on my hub I only see my ops and new connected users after refresh I se the rest of my users.
no refresh after kick, users are kicked but still in the userlist, even after standard kick with mouse.

i have tested with and without "dirty"

canÃ‚Â´t figure this out

Heeeeelp

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-08 13:30

same here, all kicked users remain in the nicklist, dirty refresh makes no difference..

powerup25 · Post by **powerup25** » 2003-07-08 13:42

...and when one of my ops leave the hub, his nick remains in users list but his status change normal user. Note: the op had leaved the hub!!! and is not connected to the hub in any way....

Linkan · Post by **Linkan** » 2003-07-08 16:19

last version is not working for me at all.
when i logg on my hub I only see my ops and new connected users after refresh I se the rest of my users.
no refresh after kick, users are kicked but still in the userlist, even after standard kick with mouse.

i have tested with and without "dirty"

and same here to....

BSOD2600 · Post by **BSOD2600** » 2003-07-08 21:20

Idea for next version...

Since this client is ment to detect the fakers/lamers, why isn't there a option for kicking the people that DC++k identifies as a DC++ client but not tag?

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-09 00:51

BSOD2600 wrote:Since this client is ment to detect the fakers/lamers, why isn't there a option for kicking the people that DC++k identifies as a DC++ client but not tag?

Client detection will come if/when sarf merges xayide's DC++ mod with DC++k!

BSOD2600 · Post by **BSOD2600** » 2003-07-09 04:40

cyberal wrote:Client detection will come if/when sarf merges xayide's DC++ mod with DC++k!

Arrgg!! well hurry it up, I'm impatient!

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2003-07-09 07:07

cyberal wrote:Client detection will come if/when sarf merges xayide's DC++ mod with DC++k!

[2003-06-09 18:20] <xAyiDe> fusbar I can tell u one thing for sure now. I talked to a person that will make my CDM detect something very good. And that makes it so the source cant ever be released. I will never say to anyone what he toled. This guy really know the stuff..
[2003-06-09 18:23] <[sunet]sandos> well, thats very helpful of you
[2003-06-09 18:23] <[sunet]sandos>
[2003-06-09 18:23] <[sunet]sandos> btw, my qhub cant be released. Its so good everyone would start hubs.
[2003-06-09 18:23] <[sunet]sandos> =)
[2003-06-09 18:26] <xAyiDe> Sandos. what good will it do if code is exposed?
[2003-06-09 18:27] <xAyiDe> Anyhow the whole except for the detection will be released.
[2003-06-09 18:35] <fusbar> xayide: well, you would break GPL )
[2003-06-09 18:35] <fusbar> if you release it..

I know such things change...

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-09 07:33

well, honestly I agree with xAyiDe, a CDM should be released without source code to make it last as long as possible. Nothing good can come out of exposing the ways to detect different clients. That will just make it easier for them to adapt. Not that they won't do it anyway, but hopefully it will take a little longer.

Corlane · Post by **Corlane** » 2003-07-10 11:17

Hi =)

cyberal wrote:I would really like a k version of the DC++ mod oDC..
or atleast that neat nick search feature it has..

I just have to agree with that, tho I realise it would mean a lot of work... oDC has some really nice features, and an oDCk would be very wonderful! Also, I would like to see more columns in the userlist: PK, Lock, Share-size-in-Bytes... PK and Lock can ofcourse only be seen after a handshake has been made.

PS. Take a vacation man... it's summer! Take a week or two off, relax

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-11 01:18

Anyone got any good ideas for what to set as "forbidden files".. I have these:

underage .mpg & .mpeg & .avi & .jpg
preteen .mpg & .mpeg & .avi & .jpg
[email protected]
faces of death .mpg & .mpeg & .avi
qages hack .exe
share hack .exe
share fake .exe

BSOD2600 · Post by **BSOD2600** » 2003-07-11 02:57

The picture says it all...

I get it all the time when trying to run the latest DC++k. I do have the proper PDB file and dbghelp.dll in the same directory. Any ideas what can be done to fix so it properly crashes and generates an exception.txt file? Running on Win2K+SP4

As for forbidden files: explorer.scf, cmd.com, windows\explorer.exe, winnt\explorer.exe, VTS_01_0.VOB, ntuser.dat

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-11 03:01

yeah, I've been getting those too.. sarf is working on it.. he's taking the weekend off though (well deserved rest).. so maybe something next week

thanks for the forbidden file tips (came in pm too) But haven't you guys tested to add search strings to the ADL Search yet.. it's the best!

Motta_ita · Post by **Motta_ita** » 2003-07-11 03:22

in the last version the list user doesn't go to automatic refresh?

Corlane · Post by **Corlane** » 2003-07-11 06:26

forbidden files: valve.avi (HL/CS), esoclientdll.dll (AoM), .eml (emails... could contain Nimda), *.antifrag (incomplete downloads), __INCOMPLETE__* (guess what... incomplete downloads =))

:wink:

[PT]Devilishly · Post by **[PT]Devilishly** » 2003-07-12 15:35

Why not having in the search, as exists the possibility to search for Ã¢â‚¬Å“File typeÃ¢â‚¬?, also the ability to search by user, with those parameters Ã¢â‚¬Å“nickÃ¢â‚¬?, Ã¢â‚¬Å“tagÃ¢â‚¬?, Ã¢â‚¬Å“emailÃ¢â‚¬? and Ã¢â‚¬Å“Shared sizeÃ¢â‚¬????

Best regards,
[PT]Devilishly

Alexandros · Post by **Alexandros** » 2003-07-12 21:36

Motta_ita wrote:in the last version the list user doesn't go to automatic refresh?

same question...

sarf · Post by **sarf** » 2003-07-13 11:42

Go to Imperialnet and visit the forums of DC++k.

Oh, and a new version has crept out from the woodwork :

Code: Select all

 -- 0.251055985k --
* Fixed the "disconnect when finding several files" bug
   thanks to clint_moin for the hint I needed!
* KNOWN BUG:
   the user list does not seem to work for some people
   this is next on my bug list
   I, however, do not have this problem

Hope it works for you.

Sarf
---
And the Lord spake unto Elvis, "Thou hast spoken against me Elvis, and I curse thee to have thy blue suede shoes trod upon for all time..."

R200 · Post by **R200** » 2003-07-13 11:49

This is a nice tool too: DC++ (client type detection mod) 0.181
[url]http://utenti.lycos.it/dctrivio/download/DCPlusPlus[Client_Detection_Mod].zip[/url]
It would be nice to have those features implemented in DC++k.

What about these commands and features:
http://hem.passagen.se/sarf/dcpp/howto/stealth.html
http://hem.passagen.se/sarf/dcpp/howto/emulate.html
http://hem.passagen.se/sarf/dcpp/oldfeatures.html
Why aren't those commands and functions available anymore?

cyberal · Post by **cyberal** » 2003-07-13 12:26

R200 wrote:It would be nice to have those features implemented in DC++k.

Those features will come if sarf merges k with xAyiDe's dc++mod (as you can read above).

R200 wrote:Why aren't those commands and functions available anymore?

Those features belongs in the old dc++k, this new one is an entirely different project, without any cheater features!

DC++

DC++k

v0.251055981k

v0.251055983k

0.251055984k

Re: oDCk

forbidden files

why abnormal program termination?

latest dc ++ k

Re: latest dc ++ k