Rate by size

Archived discussion about features (predating the use of Bugzilla as a bug and feature tracker)

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
BananJoe
Posts: 4
Joined: 2003-06-15 17:03
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Rate by size

Post by BananJoe » 2003-07-29 06:32

I think the public hub list should be rated by size instead of users
because alot of the time you have a hub at the top with 1300 users or so and your thinking this wil be great :)
but when your in the min share is 1 gb

therefore if you could change that to rating my amount of tb instead of users it would be great

cyberal
Posts: 360
Joined: 2003-05-16 05:42

Post by cyberal » 2003-07-29 06:53

easier said than done, for one, i don't think the hubs report the share amount to the hublist server.
1. Hubsoft have to report share amount to hublist server!
2. Hublist server have to understand the info.
3. Client have to be changed to display share amount.

I think I read about some hublist that supported this, and uptime etc. anyone?

btw. Big share is not always better.. more ppl equals more different tastes and more different shares.
http://whyrar.omfg.se - Guide to RAR and DC behaviour!
http://bodstrom.omfg.se - Bodströmsamhället, Länksamling om hoten mot vår personliga integritet

jbyrd
Posts: 255
Joined: 2003-05-10 09:26
Location: no-la-usa-earth
Contact:

Post by jbyrd » 2003-07-29 07:31

Dreamland Hublist had this about 3 months ago (if I remember correctly). It would have the total amount shared to the left of the hub description. Sort by description, and you have sorted by size.

Note: Just because it says it is big doesn't mean that it is; just like the number of users, the size can be faked as well.

Locked