MULTIHUB PLZ
Moderator: Moderators
MULTIHUB PLZ
can you make multihub search available to DC++
plz
plz
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 2003-01-06 09:32
just guessing here, but it seems like you didn't take the trouble of using the search functionality on this forum. the multihub search has been discussed. Just search for multihub and start reading...A wrote:r there no comments , questions on this topic
is it a old question/feature request/discussion
I SEE
few months ago
http://dcplusplus.sourceforge.net/forum ... t=multihub
but not really a reaction of the creators of dc++
r u ppl going to impl. it , should be nice
greetz A
few months ago
http://dcplusplus.sourceforge.net/forum ... t=multihub
but not really a reaction of the creators of dc++
r u ppl going to impl. it , should be nice
greetz A
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
Indeed you areGadget wrote:IMHO multihub searching doesn't really improve hub performance, at least when it comes to passive searcing. There are much stuff in active too which could take up much upload bandwidth when there are lot of hubs connected. I might be wrong, somebody could make some calculations?
The protocol only allows for active clients to use multi searching.
So there is no big amount of bandwidth wasted.
I believe arnetheduck did not implement this command since you can just as well connect to the hubs.. and/or if you are connected to 3 hubs in the hub netwok, and you multisearch, you cant tell the hub network to exclude the hubs you are already connected to / dc++ doesn't know which hubs are in the network, and you'll waste bandwidth there..
Never made that NMDCHub's multihub search to work properly. Looks like search requests take about 5-10% of hub traffic so multihub searching with lot of hubs could not be the best idea. Well there is no need to connect to so many hubs but that thing could be to complicated to our wise users to understand...aDe wrote:Indeed you are
The protocol only allows for active clients to use multi searching.
So there is no big amount of bandwidth wasted.
There might be some security-related issues too when giving search results to users, which are not connected to the hub.aDe wrote:I believe arnetheduck did not implement this command since you can just as well connect to the hubs..
External hub/multihub "indexer" (only one per hub) with searchable google-like database might be a good choice for hub networks. Well first there should be a bot like that (hint hint developers)...
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
-
- Posts: 147
- Joined: 2003-01-04 02:20
- Location: Canada http://hub-link.sf.net
- Contact:
From http://dc.ww-ei.com
ptaczek Posted: Feb 28 2003, 09:32 AM
Yes, multisearch capability will be implemented along with multichat in next public release. In these days we have got preliminar working multichat between two or more ptokax hubs. We will not support multichat/search between ptokax and nmdc hub.
--------------------
-ptaczek-
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
would that include MultiConnectToMe ?
i.e. that won't work with "automatically disconnect offline users"
i.e. that won't work with "automatically disconnect offline users"
http://dc.selwerd.nl/hublist.xml.bz2
http://www.b.ali.btinternet.co.uk/DCPlusPlus/index.html (TheParanoidOne's DC++ Guide)
http://www.dslreports.com/faq/dc (BSOD2600's Direct Connect FAQ)
http://www.b.ali.btinternet.co.uk/DCPlusPlus/index.html (TheParanoidOne's DC++ Guide)
http://www.dslreports.com/faq/dc (BSOD2600's Direct Connect FAQ)
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
Well, there's no real team. It's Arne's project. I, and others, submit patches to him for potential inclusion. If Opera's patches or Sarf's work well enough, let me know and I'll give them to Arne. But I don't have a multi-hub to test with - someone with access needs to test the two versions of forked DC++ I mentioned and see how they work, and tell how they don't work so they can be fixed (if applicable).A wrote:CAN the devolp team of dc++ contact ptokax develop (i'm not part of that just someone that's what's this feature) team or the other way
around, so that this feature really get's implemetend
hmm, I've posted this in PtokaX LUA language forum, hope someone will give a feedback soon.GargoyleMT wrote:Well, there's no real team. It's Arne's project. I, and others, submit patches to him for potential inclusion. If Opera's patches or Sarf's work well enough, let me know and I'll give them to Arne. But I don't have a multi-hub to test with - someone with access needs to test the two versions of forked DC++ I mentioned and see how they work, and tell how they don't work so they can be fixed (if applicable).A wrote:CAN the devolp team of dc++ contact ptokax develop (i'm not part of that just someone that's what's this feature) team or the other way
around, so that this feature really get's implemetend
Nice, Pink Piglet