Different Number of open slots depending on the daytime

Archived discussion about features (predating the use of Bugzilla as a bug and feature tracker)

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
passenger_57
Posts: 2
Joined: 2004-07-07 08:45

Different Number of open slots depending on the daytime

Post by passenger_57 » 2004-07-07 10:04

I wonder if would be possible to implement a feature wich would allow i. e. open 2 slots between 6:00 AM and 10:00 PM and then opens additional slots in the time between 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM.

the reason behind this is that a lot of users need some bandwith during the day for there work but not during the night. so more slots would be there during the night.

Gasp
Posts: 7
Joined: 2004-06-20 11:28

Post by Gasp » 2004-07-07 11:35

It's a misconception. You wouldn't save any bandwidth in this way, because fewer users downloading from you would have greater download speeds as most of the connection are asynchronous and the overall use would remain the same. The only solution is to use a client supporting bandwidth limiting.

PseudonympH
Forum Moderator
Posts: 366
Joined: 2004-03-06 02:46

Post by PseudonympH » 2004-07-07 23:04

What Gasp says is true (although it doesn't really have anything to do with the connection being asynchronous...), but I'd like to note that BCDC++ has this as part of the limiting feature.

cologic
Programmer
Posts: 337
Joined: 2003-01-06 13:32
Contact:

Post by cologic » 2004-07-07 23:49

I originally implemented that in BCDC++ to automatically duck out of sight of network administrators to some degree.

PseudonympH
Forum Moderator
Posts: 366
Joined: 2004-03-06 02:46

Post by PseudonympH » 2004-07-08 14:11

Good to know your heart's in the right place. :wink:

Gasp
Posts: 7
Joined: 2004-06-20 11:28

Post by Gasp » 2004-07-08 15:00

PseudonympH wrote:What Gasp says is true (although it doesn't really have anything to do with the connection being asynchronous...), but I'd like to note that BCDC++ has this as part of the limiting feature.
Oh, sorry, I obviously didn't make myself clear. What I meant was of course that in DC networks there is much bigger potential of download speed so other users could easily make use of additional speed per slot... well, whatever.

passenger_57
Posts: 2
Joined: 2004-07-07 08:45

Post by passenger_57 » 2004-07-08 15:10

cologic wrote:I originally implemented that in BCDC++ to automatically duck out of sight of network administrators to some degree.
thx foks that's what i wanted to know. also i would like to have this in dc++. cause bcdc++ isn't allowed in every hub.

Twink
Posts: 436
Joined: 2003-03-31 23:31
Location: New Zealand

Post by Twink » 2004-07-08 19:18

passenger_57 wrote:
cologic wrote:I originally implemented that in BCDC++ to automatically duck out of sight of network administrators to some degree.
thx foks that's what i wanted to know. also i would like to have this in dc++. cause bcdc++ isn't allowed in every hub.
its also one of the reasons bcdc isn't allowed in every hub

PseudonympH
Forum Moderator
Posts: 366
Joined: 2004-03-06 02:46

Post by PseudonympH » 2004-07-09 01:31

The hubs I'm on never seem to pick up that I'm using BCDC++ instead of vanilla, though.

Locked