Please don't use BCDC++ 0.305b, i mean B...
Moderator: Moderators
Please don't use BCDC++ 0.305b, i mean B...
I found a very important bug in BCDC++ 0.305b. It totally mixes the filelist!!
Please don't use 0.305b, use an older version, like 305a
You can check the difference here:
>Filelist with 0.305b<
>The same directories shared with 0.305a<
Of course, the 0.305a is the real directory structure. You can save the filelists with right-button mouse click and "save target as...".. then to view the difference, start any dc++/bcdc++/sg, and open the saved filelists with the "Open flie list.." menu.
Thanks
Please don't use 0.305b, use an older version, like 305a
You can check the difference here:
>Filelist with 0.305b<
>The same directories shared with 0.305a<
Of course, the 0.305a is the real directory structure. You can save the filelists with right-button mouse click and "save target as...".. then to view the difference, start any dc++/bcdc++/sg, and open the saved filelists with the "Open flie list.." menu.
Thanks
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 587
- Joined: 2003-05-07 02:38
- Location: Sweden, Linkoping
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
-
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 2003-01-03 07:33
I wouldn't use BCDC 305b because it seems to have an issue with its connectionmanager. People who are uploading from me will get shutoff within 30 seconds. On my end it appears with "upload finished idle".
I also noticed a problem with the filelist. For example, I only share MP3s. With 305a I share 55GB and with 305b was sharing 49GB.
I also noticed a problem with the filelist. For example, I only share MP3s. With 305a I share 55GB and with 305b was sharing 49GB.
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
It had a problem with ZBlock and Throttling. I fixed that, and versions based on recent SVN should fix it. Maybe that version is already released, it's probably worth checking.BSOD2600 wrote:I wouldn't use BCDC 305b because it seems to have an issue with its connectionmanager. People who are uploading from me will get shutoff within 30 seconds. On my end it appears with "upload finished idle".
Oh, and thanks for the correction fusbar. I saw the revision tag, but I have no idea what releases are paired with what version of source.
Anyway, I linked wrong filelists, extremly sorryGargoyleMT wrote:The latest development version doesn't have that problem, and I hadn't seen a 0.305b user mention that before. There was a bug in ShareManager that sandos mentioned as being fixed - "fixed file list building". Perhaps 0.305b predates that fix.
But..
There's still an issue:
The correctly definied bug is the following:
The new version makes a smaller sharesize, because it thinks about many files that they are duplicates.
So i shared the same directory with the same option (don't exlude dupes).. 305a makes 11.9 GB share from my files, 305b makes 10.01 GB.. There's 1.9 G diff.. (i have screenshot, but i wouldn't like to include it here, because i haven't edited out the private hub address from the pic)
Then I wanted to know why makes this smaller share from the same files. So I turned on the "remove dupes completely from share" option and checked the list
The difference is here:
http://invitel.hu/mollihun/temp/share2.jpg
http://invitel.hu/mollihun/temp/share1.jpg
So after this, I could figure out why is the sharesize smaller.. It thinks about many files that they are dupes, but don't know why
The filelists which I linked is from 305a and opera-edition, it's mislinked.. The correct links are the screenshots
So this is why BSOD2600 has a smaller share too..
In addition, when I added a directory which contanied some kazaa-incomplete files (4.4 M in 3 files) and 25.3 MB in 8 other files, my share became smaller, to 9.75 GB (At least after refresh it went back to 10.03 .. )
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
I re-downloaded it 5 minutes before my previous post to make it sure..GargoyleMT wrote:Is this the same EXE we're talking about? Download it again.
I'm not going to bother tracking down your problems if they're already fixed.
And I compiled it from the source too (svn173) with the same result.
So yes, the same. Don't have to believe me, but in this topic not I am the only person who get smaller share.. Just share 30 GBs mp3, you will see the difference.
After you add the directory to your share in the settings, it shows the whole size, after you click on OK, it gets smaller much more that it should be...
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
Ah, I see WZA is hosting 174 now. That explains where you got the source, since utrum still only has src from 0.263.FleetCmd wrote:And I compiled it from the source too (svn173) with the same result.
Heh, well 0.305b was apparently based on svn 116 or so, so don't blame me for making sure you're running the latest release.So yes, the same. Don't have to believe me, but in this topic not I am the only person who get smaller share.. Just share 30 GBs mp3, you will see the difference.
Hm.. Now I should check the diff between 173 and 174.. eh (indeed, i got the source this morning, wza didn't hosted 305b source then.. it could have been put there 1 or 2 hours ago i think.. )GargoyleMT wrote:Ah, I see WZA is hosting 174 now. That explains where you got the source, since utrum still only has src from 0.263.FleetCmd wrote:And I compiled it from the source too (svn173) with the same result.
-
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-07 21:46
- Location: .pa.us
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: 2003-04-18 05:57
- Location: Oporto, Portugal
- Contact: