DC++

For reference, in case we lose the URL again: http://dcplusplus.sourceforge.net/ADC-0.10pre.html

Edit: I'm retarded.

Pothead wrote:Is Sedulus on holiday or something ?, as the public been down for over 2 weeks.

Good question. I'll mail him, since that's the most I can do.

ivulfusbar wrote:A remote bot went bananas.

Mmm. Bananas.

It seems to be updated eventually. Perhaps this is an artifact of the changes to the sending of myinfo?

Please don't use oDC - it is based on DC++ 0.306, which is pretty old at this point (2004-01-09). fulDC is a good alternative.

ullner wrote:'0.05' in Max upload speed is there twice. And in PublicHublistDlg.h;

Ah, non-localized strings. And the first 0.05 should be 0.005, probably.

Pothead wrote:And ideas about the results of this discussion ?

What FarCry said. cologic probably had something to say, maybe Trem or arne too. But that was the gist of it.

mai9 wrote:much more practical to use than opening DC++ settings everytime you want to change limits.Âº

And that's why BCDC has a /command for changing the limit on the fly...

I made som quick tests on it and it seems to alawys hapen when downloading filelists from version 0.401 of DC++ and probably 0.402 as well but there was only one person using that client during my test. Version 0.403 seems to work fine. That might be the $UGetBlock thing. I don't think it being fix...

eve wrote:also.. any good link ?
thanks !

I had a generic link of clients in my previous message. I wanted to let you choose and experiment for yourself.

eve wrote:ok

You realize there are DC++ based clients that offer this feature? I suggest you use one of them.

Eve, bandwidth limiting is such a point of contention that arne decided he's not going to add it. It is listed in the rejected feature tracker, which I notice that I failed to mention in my sticky post at the top of this forum: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=5 ... unc=browse

Old file list? Odd. There's probably still a $UGetBlock disconnection issue around somewhere too.

Do you have any more details about how to reproduce it, or should it be pretty obvious?

Here's my list of stuff that seems to amiss in CVS: * The "hub name" seems inconsistent; it copies two words for "DCDev Private", but only one for another hub I'm on "VGMC Pocket" (ah, there's much more after "Private", but with "Pocket", it's the end of the string * "Your" nick in PM seems to be us...

Guitarm wrote:Just wanted to say: Nice work Garg, thanks!

Thanks... or you're welcome

TheParanoidOne wrote:Me please. (need to go and install an svn client ...)

Will do.

Er... sidenote, anyone who wants svn access to the repository I'm using for the crash code can have it. I do want peer review, since that's part of what Vinnia's solution lacked.

ivulfusbar wrote:The hub is up and running again. )

Ooooh, shiny.

Wow, so now the private dev hub is timing out now too?

We have had a discussion about this in the past, but my log greppage isn't helping turn up the conversation.

There are a lot of 3rd party DLLs that are seen in crashes, I was thinking about having a regexp match before entering a new call stack. The regexp could be a full stop or emit a warning, based on "severity." a partial list I've scribbled down is this: Vslp (V-One Smartpass) mclsp (McAfee AV) Niphk ...

I would give copyright to arnetheduck, if he want. I thought about this a bit more after I posted my response - you don't have copyright assignment as part of your terms for accepting patches, right? If not, copyright for the code in question is spread out over everyone who contributed to that code...

I've more or less finished work on the crash collector. The interface to view the crashes is here: http://dcpp.net/crash/stats.php Arne had a couple suggestions for its improvement, I'd welcome more. I think this would be useful for potential contributors; see common DC++ crashes and submit patches ...

Wisp wrote:Maybe it could be implemented in the hub software only, so users have the option of joining a secure hub (which will be a little slower)

I don't think that would work...

User Commands? The ones you get by right clicking various things in DC++?

Is it possible to check the user's upload speed when he/she connects to the hub??? If yes, is it possible to make an script that kicks the user if the speed is below the set treshold??? Of course it is possible. But I've not seen evidence that anyone has done it. And by that I mean you'd have to wr...

obscuring the file name not, but routing the traffic trough other clients will. As far as i can judge, it is possible to make clients anonymous that way I'm not sure that you could do that and maintain the things that draw users to the DC network. DC++ will get SSL in ADC mode, and we'll have to se...

The queue is currently file-oriented - the tree hierarchy in the Download Queue is all done with smoke and mirrors. You could put it in bugzilla and see if it gets voted on enough to be automatically approved.

Your other suggestions are worthy of bugzilla as well.

liny wrote:I would give copyright to arnetheduck, if he want.

Interesting, I'll make sure he sees that.

@GargoyleMT, there are a lot of known cases where RIAA wrongfully accused people of sharing. Victims mostly accept a settlement because they fear the huge compensations. The existence of false positives doesn't change the conclusion that obscuring the file name wouldn't gain anything given how the ...

I know it's not that easy to understand even your own program if it's big enough and you haven't looked at it for some time. However, if a project is well organized, and there are enough comments, then it isn't that dificult to catch what's going on in the algorithm. fusbar wouldn't have said it if...

Pothead wrote:Did you put the Contents of WTL\Include in the WTL\ of dc++ source ?

I know I didn't, and I get that error too. But since the instructions in compile.txt indicate that's how arne wants it done, I guess I have no choice.

Since when sniffing filename can be recognized by packet header mabe we need only to encript packet header If you're only concerned about obscuring the filename, there aren't any legitimate reasons I can think of for that other than hiding from the enforcement agencies. Encrypting the filename will...

Then the only thing they can do about it is outbound blocking, which would lead to pain in the ass for them, or not? I'd be surprised if this is the case. I'm sure, encrypted or not, DC++'s traffic patterns are pretty recognizable, and may even be unique. Sure, a long transfer may look like a HTTPS...

The other way to look at your feature is to realize that DC++ could behave better when getting tons of search results.

Yes, I think that once hashing is complete, the safeguards in ShareManager::generateXmlList() should probably be bypassed.

Heh, I see the StrongDC forum isn't actively policed. I'd never let anyone get away with talking about sharing an album here...

So if bug reports would be separate from feature requests, it would be much easier... Couse in help I only found an explanation how to report a bug, but I didn't find, that making a request is the same procedure... When we were using the trackers at sourceforge, we did have separate bug and feature...

Encryption has been a long-time requested feature, but primarily (I hope) for other reasons. Hello everyone, I would like to make a proposal. Due to the recent crakdown by the RIAA and MPAA, I think it would be a great idea to implement encryption into DC++. Bah, the MPAA and RIAA have every right t...

Just because someone give a suggestion on how to improve DC++, doesn't mean it's a good suggestion. It is nice to see what users want, and feature suggestions help. Users are what make DC++ popular, but it's true that not every feature can be implemented. Determining the popularity of a request (or...

If he hasn't figured it out after 12 months, I suspect he doesn't need help now...

The conclusion isn't that silly when you think a little on it. First of all, the most useful advices were: "Use different program". This means that the program isn't capable of being as good as other software, not even mentioning to be better! I really was disappointed by answers in some way, becau...

Visually, the patch looks fine, but I'm not in a frame of mind where I can give a particularly critical review.

The problem is with subdirectories, as you said in your post. I'm not sure how to handle it... There has to be some recursive directory thing. No directory should be moved until all of the sub-dirs or root dirs has finished. No, the problem isn't necessarily subdirectories, but "grouping" queued do...

Then add a routine that checks after a file has been downloaded, if it's the last file in the directory. If not, leave it in the unfinished, if it is - move all of the files to finished downloads Files are eased out of DC++'s queue once they're completed, what you're asking for probably would requi...

This isn't in bugzilla, though it has been requested before. I'm not sure how I feel about it, or how it should be implemented - usually the issues behind it (sharing incomplete sets of files) can be solved through other features instead.

Should be able to do it only by comparing Name of user from search results, with names of filelist's it's previsously received. You'll have to store the Stated share size of this filelist, and check to see if it changed (re-download), or the same (match queue on existing one) :) Hmm? You seem to be...

Carraya wrote:Oh if that is the case...

Either of us could be right, the wording is ambiguous. He may follow-up and clarify, but that doesn't always happen. (And I missed your interpretation when reading it initially.)

It is in the request tracker:
[Bug 59] Search locally stored filelists automatically

Blippo wrote:How's that hurting hub performance, eh?

DC++ has that feature too, for manual searches. The original request was for adjusting timing between the automated alternate searches, which is going to effect the hub's bandwidth (eventually) a lot more than a few manual searches.

Wow! - Well... I don't have 100$ According to the official MS FAQ s, Studio Express doesn't include ATL, which is needed for DC++ and WTL. There was a post on the WTL mailing list about getting Express to compile WTL applications, you might have luck in finding it and following the instructions. Th...

Cronck wrote:What would you recommend that i use then?
And is it freeware?

Nothing capable of compiling DC++ is freeware. Visual C++ 2003 is $100 and available through http://www.amazon.com.

DC++

Search found 2858 matches

Re: Namespace vs Class

CVS todo list?

down to zero hubs

Crash collector

Re: User speed checker....