Search found 306 matches
- 2004-05-20 01:53
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Secure hubs - fail to protect against 0.401
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6795
- 2004-05-19 06:21
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Fakers
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5091
- 2004-05-18 15:59
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: I don't want the exact size in auto search
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2733
- 2004-05-17 13:32
- Forum: Hubs and scripts
- Topic: looking for scripts or bots for yhub, nmdc, & ptokax
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2348
- 2004-05-17 00:07
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Ratio tab change
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3015
In the worst possible case, where all other block types would expand the data, deflation falls back to stored (uncompressed) blocks. Thus the only expansion is an overhead of 5 bytes per 32 KB block (.02%), plus a one-time overhead of six bytes for the entire stream. In the absolute worst case of a...
- 2004-05-09 07:49
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Disable the insane file list downloading
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2271
- 2004-05-09 06:00
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: choose
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6764
- 2004-05-04 04:38
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Share Source Profile For Each Hub
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3481
- 2004-05-01 01:57
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Entropy p2p claims anonymity by file dispertion
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4538
Xan: Entropy appears to be essentially an (emphasizing filesharing? I'm not actually sure) interface to Freenet. Its anonymity derives from that. Also: 8) 8) 8) I don ' t think you know what you ' r e talking about GargoyleMT ; (remove 'And') I certainly don ' t think you know anything of the archit...
- 2004-04-30 12:35
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Multiple Source Downloading.
- Replies: 95
- Views: 51541
I'll leave the speed arguments alone, at least for now. what you said about the fact that atm there are very high quality files and not any fakes (that Ive experienced) is part of the fact that it is not multisource....multisource is like a disease that jumps from user to user....multi source is the...
- 2004-04-29 04:21
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: stunnel
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6003
- 2004-04-29 03:43
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: stunnel
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6003
- 2004-04-27 03:44
- Forum: DCH++ General
- Topic: When will dch++ be relased
- Replies: 22
- Views: 25256
Wow. It's been well more than a year. DC has only existed, IIRC, for 4 or 5 total, and DC++ itself for only 2.5 years or so according to the changelog. That arne's been able to sustain interest in this either astounds me, that people think it'll be that good (I have no basis for saying otherwise, bu...
- 2004-04-26 18:22
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Speed I really can provide
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4151
Re: Speed I really can provide
What I mean: #include <stdio.h> #include <conio.h> #include <afxinet.h> #include <wininet.h> main() { int hora,horafinal,final,abits,conexion,cs; printf("hit 1 if modem and 0 if better: "); scanf("%d",&cs); fflush(stdin); HINTERNET hSession; hSession = InternetOpen("MyApp", INTERNET_OPEN_TYPE_DIRECT...
- 2004-04-26 18:11
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Speed I really can provide
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4151
- 2004-04-22 23:10
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: dDC++ 6.02 released
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8161
(with credit to http://www.codehappy.net/ipaddress.htm)
- 2004-04-22 11:56
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Don't show transfer of file lists in transfer window
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2388
- 2004-04-22 05:46
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: BCDC 0.401a Crash Exception Info
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8521
Lua is a quite nonproprietary language, used by DCH++, Ptokax (in an earlier version), and many other pieces of software as well. Deleting the *.lua files in the DC++ directory won't make this worse, I guess, though I'm not sure it'll help. The problem appears to be solved in the more or less unrel...
- 2004-04-22 05:41
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Include Banned File list!
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1281
See this thread.
- 2004-04-20 15:40
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: Mod list
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16855
My understanding is that you run the (main?) Stealth DC download site, as well as its forums. You can claim I'm wrong here as you did when you claimed intrabrew didn't write Stealth ("oh, no, it was interbrew, and I never noticed!" ... bullshit.), but there's a fair bit of evidence that says you do....
- 2004-04-20 15:13
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: Mod list
- Replies: 28
- Views: 16855
- 2004-04-19 20:18
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: BCDC 0.401a Crash Exception Info
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8521
- 2004-04-14 21:17
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: File Dates & Times
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1799
IIt has been suggested.
- 2004-04-14 08:42
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Folder Sharing system
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3713
however to be honest it might not be a great idea just to have one huge folder full of lots and lots of files. But basically my point was that this feature doesn't really belong in a file system/ os (unless you start talking raid or similar which is a different matter) as the os would still have to...
- 2004-04-10 20:12
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: BCDC 0.401a Crash Exception Info
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8521
- 2004-04-09 16:43
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Folder Sharing system
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3713
This kind of functionality doesn't belong in DC++, but rather in the filesystem itself: the organization suggested would benefit me as the user of the system as much as it would random, pseudoanonymous strangers from the internet browsing my files. These two programs facilitate such on MS's only fil...
- 2004-04-05 04:52
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Message History
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3046
- 2004-04-05 01:29
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: UL/DL Ratios in tag
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5769
even if noone ever broke the lock/key system it would have been faked because before i knew of any better clients i used to make dc connect through a homemade proxy and mess with the un'encrypted' messages. Yes, DC's being largely unencrypted probably made such faking-proxies easier. It didn't necc...
- 2004-04-05 00:32
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: BCDC 0.401a Crash Exception Info
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8521
- 2004-04-04 11:37
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: UL/DL Ratios in tag
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5769
i think its about as bad as the origional "tag" idea. I agree, but see my comment about the original tag idea. the fact is unless arnet makes his own network closed source with some crazy ass encrypted protocol people will fake no matter what information is sent. You should know better than this, h...
- 2004-04-04 03:26
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: UL/DL Ratios in tag
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5769
Erm, what gave you the impression of excitement or such from which one might cool down? Anyway. It hasn't been implemented because people never fully agreed it'd be desireable (it's not impervious to being gamed, it disproportionaly promotes shares dominated by popular files where one might argue DC...
- 2004-04-04 03:19
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: IP listed in active transfers
- Replies: 58
- Views: 31804
DC (the protocol in general, no matter what client one's using) promiscuously spreads one's IP. Users should be aware of this, and basking in ignorance whilst the copyright enforcement agencies hunt for future lawsuit victims is shortsighted and counterproductive. Claiming something like "okay, we k...
- 2004-04-03 15:09
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: UL/DL Ratios in tag
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5769
Yes, I agree. Tags should be removed.Anticheat wrote:Well then let's disable completly the tags...
I participated in that thread; it's not dumb. Your idea, by quite stark contrast, is very dumb.Anticheat wrote:There was in the past a thread about a ratings server (protocol alley).... it's seem to be abandonated.
- 2004-04-03 13:32
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: UL/DL Ratios in tag
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5769
- 2004-04-03 13:22
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: IP listed in active transfers
- Replies: 58
- Views: 31804
It wasn't introduced earlier simply because no one had bothered writing it earlier. I took that initiative, and thus now it's in DC++. That's really a pretty stupid objection. My strongest motivation for writing this patch was precisely because I knew the reaction it would generate, that people jeal...
- 2004-04-02 04:02
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: BCDC++Bug font black always
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3014
- 2004-04-02 04:01
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: IP listed in active transfers
- Replies: 58
- Views: 31804
- 2004-03-31 06:29
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: rmDC++ special faking client version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4893
- 2004-03-31 06:25
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: rmDC++ special faking client version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4893
- 2004-03-31 06:21
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: rmDC++ special faking client version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4893
Okay. Bit late for a warning about a piece of software that's been open source since its inception two and a half years ago, wouldn't you agree? (I've participated in my share of threads as to why this won't work, so I'll let someone else do that if they feel like it. Otherwise, lolin, just search t...
- 2004-03-31 06:12
- Forum: Other Direct Connect tools
- Topic: rmDC++ special faking client version
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4893
- 2004-03-31 01:17
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Hashing slow down computer too much
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14714
8GB/hour of tiger hashing consuming 30% of (presumably a 3+GHz Pentium 4?) strikes me as implausible. Here's why: This site provides some hash speeds that have proven fairly reasonable in my experience. With that in mind, the 8GB/hour number is equivalent to 2.27MB/s. Compare this with 40MB/s for Cr...
- 2004-03-31 00:40
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Hashing slow down computer too much
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14714
- 2004-03-30 23:26
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Hashing slow down computer too much
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14714
- 2004-03-30 23:05
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Pause download when setting priority to paused
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6581
- 2004-03-29 08:43
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: IP listed in active transfers
- Replies: 58
- Views: 31804
- 2004-03-29 08:37
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Hashing slow down computer too much
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14714
Well, on my computer (Athlon XP 2100+/1.73GHz) DC++ hashes approximately 25-35MB/second depending on conditions. That's about 1.8GB/file to have to hash for a minute. Either your share consists entirely of enormous files, your disk system sucks (DMA mode enabled?), or your filesystem sucks (excessiv...
- 2004-03-29 04:23
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Search features
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4062
- 2004-03-29 04:23
- Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
- Topic: Hashing slow down computer too much
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14714
- 2004-03-14 10:56
- Forum: Hubs and scripts
- Topic: Idea: The 10000 user experiment
- Replies: 14
- Views: 7143
And when they sometimes reference calculators, especially TI calculators, I've known them to give "^" as information on how to perform exponentiation. They don't only say it to explain how to use your calculator, but also for sample TI-BASIC programs they supply in the text So .. when it refers to ...