Search found 348 matches

by cyberal
2003-07-31 16:46
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Search queue
Replies: 5
Views: 1807

I think a queue system for the search is way to much! Not needed, all I want (and I speak only for myself) is to move the search timeout from the hub to me for all the reasons above... no need to do multiple manual searches at once..
by cyberal
2003-07-31 10:27
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Request - "direct send" and more.
Replies: 44
Views: 4259

Gourmet:
1. short: have been discussed before, and dismissed.. this is (ofcourse) not supported by the protocol and would be complicated (and unecessary?) to implement!
2. Just do a "disconnect user" on him and the granted slot is off.

jbyrd:
1. DC++k jave this, and probably BCDC too!
by cyberal
2003-07-31 09:22
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Search queue
Replies: 5
Views: 1807

from this thread: m Regarding the matter of these 10/5 seconds search timeouts. I undestand the hubowners need it, search strings represent a large amount of the total bandwidth used. I would like a feature that make this thingy less irritating clientside, an own search timeout.. it would work like ...
by cyberal
2003-07-31 05:23
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Speed limiters
Replies: 16
Views: 2473

CFOS
by cyberal
2003-07-31 05:11
Forum: Hubs and scripts
Topic: Small prob. with my hub.......!
Replies: 9
Views: 1330

-=Jabo=- wrote:I have the setting for my name set to Master.....could that be the prob?

Sorry, didn't see this post at first, YES.. thats the problem.. set your admin name to something else!
by cyberal
2003-07-31 05:10
Forum: Hubs and scripts
Topic: Small prob. with my hub.......!
Replies: 9
Views: 1330

sounds like you named one of your bots/admin accounts to you nick?
by cyberal
2003-07-30 14:24
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Speed limiters
Replies: 16
Views: 2473

I think I speak for everyone when I say: huh?
by cyberal
2003-07-30 09:47
Forum: Hubs and scripts
Topic: Pm to ops
Replies: 8
Views: 1022

Like an OP-Chat that lets users send but not recieve?
by cyberal
2003-07-30 09:03
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Minimum dl speed option
Replies: 3
Views: 702

yes, you are the first person to suggest this, DC has been around for years and not until now did anyone come up with this, there aren't any posts what so ever regarding this subject in the forum.. plz DO NOT use the search!
by cyberal
2003-07-30 09:01
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Improvement of the search engine
Replies: 6
Views: 1029

most machines eh? lol
by cyberal
2003-07-30 06:29
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: anonymity through proxy like network and encryption
Replies: 3
Views: 755

this is an entirely new network you are talking about.. or if you want, an old one (freenet).. dc can't be modified to do this!
by cyberal
2003-07-30 02:07
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: lock tabs
Replies: 19
Views: 1962

well, the main reason for this post i think was to lock hubs... and that popup won't be annoying.. it will only popup if you try to close a locked tab without unlocking it first.. I think the idea of having a chance to close the tab without having to unlock it is good.. it's just like the warning yo...
by cyberal
2003-07-29 15:36
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: lock tabs
Replies: 19
Views: 1962

or maybe that popup could say: "This tab is locked! Are you sure you wanna close it?" And then two buttons: "Close tab anyway!" & "No!"..
by cyberal
2003-07-29 13:32
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: DC++ Decription Tag as a Prefix??
Replies: 11
Views: 1928

Why remove the tag, it is used by many and is easily hidden, and so is the e-mail field? Don't see a problem here. This thread is out of date btw. the description tag has it's own column now.. no need to put it "first in the description".
by cyberal
2003-07-29 13:27
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: lock tabs
Replies: 19
Views: 1962

This could be implemented together with a "locked on join" checkbox in favorite hubs!
by cyberal
2003-07-29 06:53
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Rate by size
Replies: 2
Views: 492

easier said than done, for one, i don't think the hubs report the share amount to the hublist server. 1. Hubsoft have to report share amount to hublist server! 2. Hublist server have to understand the info. 3. Client have to be changed to display share amount. I think I read about some hublist that ...
by cyberal
2003-07-29 01:11
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Segment Downloading
Replies: 37
Views: 4918

I wouldn't mind to contribute..
by cyberal
2003-07-29 01:06
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: lock tabs
Replies: 19
Views: 1962

me like also, me have this problem too, me want :)
by cyberal
2003-07-29 01:02
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Don't search immediately with search for alternates.
Replies: 7
Views: 2025

It would be handy if search for alternatives was shown in the DC++ tag as many hub owners may not want users to have this feature activated. naah, this matter is easily handled with a hubscript.. just don't allow searches more than every X minutes... no need to make a fakable tag out of it! I agree...
by cyberal
2003-07-28 16:06
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

concerns? about what?
what harm can encryption possibly do?
by cyberal
2003-07-28 13:25
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

Your against traffic limiting is like saying that no ISP could possibly implement a spam filter, because it might block legitimate mail. But modern ISPs do have spam filters. The spam filter is there for You, not for them! And I'm certain that ISP conf their filters real careful not to block legit ...
by cyberal
2003-07-28 12:23
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

by cyberal
2003-07-28 12:21
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

Link? sure thing.. in swedish though.. [quote="GargoyleMT"]you could still throttle down transfers that last over, say, 30 minutes, to a reasonable limit[quote] No! That traffic could potentially be legit, you could be loading the latest SP from MS or a linux release or what ever! They ca...
by cyberal
2003-07-28 12:14
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

I know here, in the states, they do not have this mentality. Guess that it's hard to understand that not a single ISP would avoid limiting traffic on certain protocols. Here in sweden, the two main ISPs already have this installed! That is a HUGE assumption. It seems that those ISPs are making the ...
by cyberal
2003-07-28 10:33
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

Cyberal decides that he wants to stop p2p sharing. So, he hires a whole staff to monitor activity. It has nothing to do with that really, what they want is to stop the big users from taking up the bandwidth.. it happens to be p2p-traffic yes. So, when Cyberal is able to sort through all of the porn...
by cyberal
2003-07-28 09:17
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

by keeping the traffic low they earn HUGE amounts of money.. thats what they gain.. also I find it a bit uncomfortable that the admins with an easy mouseclick instantly can see EXACTLY what we are doing in the hubs!! Encryption is an important step towards anonymity!!
by cyberal
2003-07-28 08:09
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Don't search immediately with search for alternates.
Replies: 7
Views: 2025

Great suggestion!
i want this too!!
by cyberal
2003-07-28 08:07
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

saving money ofcourse, bandwidth cost money.. what they want is to sell us a service at the highest price they can and then make us use it as little as possible! Limiting illegal p2p-traffic is a good way of doing this.. custumers won't complain that they can't use kazaa will they?
by cyberal
2003-07-28 01:50
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

1. Proof? Yes, they just told us in the newspapers. I don't use IRC for anything else than to talk, so I don't really care about it, but yes... encryption would be good there too! 2. Well yeah, you have a point there.. but we mustn't forget that it is the illegal big-scale filesharing they want gone...
by cyberal
2003-07-27 14:37
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Upload folder selection
Replies: 22
Views: 1883

TheParanoidOne mentioned TweakUI, have you taken a look in the TweakUI drive tab to see if your m: & l: are selected... maybe you can make them visible somehow with that tool... uncheck and then check... if it is a weird windows bug.. it might just work?
by cyberal
2003-07-27 14:30
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Encrypted file transfer
Replies: 21
Views: 2294

well, you are not entirely correct.. implementing encryption into dc++ doesn't make you "safe" and maybe not even "safer", but it helps on other levels... here in sweden most of the ISPs is now using apps like PacketLogic to analyze traffic and limit certain protocols.. like fasttrack and direct con...
by cyberal
2003-07-27 04:46
Forum: Protocol Alley
Topic: types of filelists
Replies: 7
Views: 2627

umm, isn't the .bz2 a compressed .dclst ?
by cyberal
2003-07-26 03:26
Forum: Hubs and scripts
Topic: Disapppearing Hub!
Replies: 2
Views: 520

The name of the app that can retrieve lost windows is "HiderPX".. can be found on the Ptokax homepage.. but I'm sure many dc users have it too!
by cyberal
2003-07-25 05:20
Forum: Protocol Alley
Topic: Encryption?
Replies: 78
Views: 69158

suddenly, the importance of encryption becomes clear.. the swedish ISP's has turned to the "trafic shaping" company NetIntact and their product PacketLogic that analyze the traffic and limits p2p traffic! "Ett förbud resulterar enligt operatörerna bara till att fildelningsprogrammen börjar ...
by cyberal
2003-07-25 05:01
Forum: Programmer's Help
Topic: dc++ 2.61 with .net 2003 standard edition
Replies: 8
Views: 1730

plz shot... 0.261 .. not 2.61 :)
by cyberal
2003-07-24 01:04
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: mathc share?
Replies: 21
Views: 2425

GargoyleMT wrote:I don't think any true collector will need such a feature. ;)

Great finish line!
by cyberal
2003-07-24 01:02
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: File list refreshing
Replies: 27
Views: 2486

jbyrd wrote:Here is a good icon for reconnect (without the "refresh" arrows)Image

that pic is beautiful!! :D arne.. switch the reconnect icon for this one!!
by cyberal
2003-07-24 00:58
Forum: Hubs and scripts
Topic: odc/dc++ only
Replies: 8
Views: 1388

GargoyleMT wrote:That's purely graphical eyecandy. Tags are sent the same way in 0.261 as in 0.251. - $MyINFO as part of the description field.

AARRGHH! Me knows this. Me is tired! :(
by cyberal
2003-07-23 09:24
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: mathc share?
Replies: 21
Views: 2425

I have a share of 300-700 GB depending on what hub I'm in. I know EXACTLY what I share.. thats the whole point!
by cyberal
2003-07-23 07:32
Forum: Hubs and scripts
Topic: odc/dc++ only
Replies: 8
Views: 1388

btw. should say "NMDC Clients are not allowed" or even better "Only DC++ and oDC are allowed"
by cyberal
2003-07-23 07:30
Forum: Hubs and scripts
Topic: odc/dc++ only
Replies: 8
Views: 1388

oDCs description tag do contain the DC++ tag too, should work fine.. but does it work with newest DC++ now when the tag has it's own column?
by cyberal
2003-07-23 05:20
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: drag & drop DC++ sections
Replies: 7
Views: 867

drag & drop DC++ sections

SMEE AGAIN!!

I want the different "sections" in the DC++ interface to be movable, just like the toolbars in IE. One section for the button bar, one for window view, one for the transfers and one for the window tabs. Just drag 'n drop them where you want them.. huh? Wouldn't this be awesome!!!
by cyberal
2003-07-22 13:53
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: Contextmenu Improvements for DC++ Windows
Replies: 3
Views: 389

queueing system.. I've wanted this for a long time, the answer is "the nmdc way".. DC++ would download the files in the order they have in the queue window. Get rid of that stupid priority system.. it sucks!
by cyberal
2003-07-22 11:59
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: File list refreshing
Replies: 27
Views: 2486

When you're done verifying/moving, simply refresh. Ofcourse, I agree with you totally! I don't share my downloads folder, and not my finished downloads either.. always check my files before I share them. But it would be nice to get rid of the /refresh thingy! If I have to do it manually, the least ...
by cyberal
2003-07-22 10:42
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: File list refreshing
Replies: 27
Views: 2486

To be honest, I think one hour is still to often. Once a day sounds plenty. Most people don't change their shares very often. hm, well.. most ppl download stuff quite frequently I belive.. and new stuff should be shared. If you only gonna refresh once a day I see no reason to do it automaticly... b...
by cyberal
2003-07-22 10:39
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: File list refreshing
Replies: 27
Views: 2486

I can agree that a more frequent refresh would be nice, lotsa ppl move their stuff around all the time for some reason. :shock: I don't but I see why ppl sould want it..

Why not make the refresh interval custumizable?
by cyberal
2003-07-22 08:06
Forum: Feature Discussion (Archived)
Topic: mathc share?
Replies: 21
Views: 2425

jbyrd: AGREE!
*grrrr*