Re: [dcdev] adc
2004-01-23 3:39
Direct Connect developers <[email protected]>, Fredrik Tolf <[email protected]>

That was what I was referring to. And I don't think anyone said that
the current protocol was perfect.

That's even why it is called a draft :)

In any case, I don't really know why I even followed up on the DoS
matter. The thing that I really don't agree with about ADC is the fact
that such a command division isn't actually necessary. I believe that
all commands should be clearly defined, and those that are broadcasted
should be specified in such a way that allows for easy future
extension of those commands.

And even to ease hub/client developper work. If you should read more than 2 times a protocol specification to hope you have understand well it (not in detail but the concept), it is bad, especially if something looks badly definite, it is the best way to have client/hub incompatibility.


DC Developers mailinglist