Yes, this probably makes more sense, although has the possible downside of
tying down to protocol level what is recoverable and what is not...unless
they're completely separated, code and severity...hm...

/J

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of eric
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 6:54 PM
To: Direct Connect developers
Subject: Re: [dcdev] adc
> ADC has made it to v0.4

Using an error code in ERR is a good idea however but the code you gave is rather ... illogical. They seems to be grouped by program sending them (client, hub, ...) but I think it is more logic to group them by kind of results (ok, recoveral, not recoverable, fatal) and then by program (or program and then kind). IMHO, Nick invalid cannot be in the same category as nick busy. Nick busy is recoverable but nick invalid is not recoveral, same goes for perm/temp ban (not recoverable/recoverable).
Eric

-- 
DC Developers mailinglist
http://3jane.ashpool.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcdev