eric writes:
> > > Also, I might agree that some commands might not need ACKing at all. I
> > can't think of such a command, though. I really do think that there
> > should be some kind of ACK for the search command, though. It would
> > be really useful to know when the search has been accepted.
> > command like public/private chat command may not need to have an ACK.
Well, I was thinking that when the chat line gets bounced back, that
could serve more or less as an ACK. But other than that, you're right.

Fredrik Tolf