...if someone bases their code on cvs versions
*cough*czdc++*cough*, it's their fault, not mine, as 0.263 doesn't care
about extended hubs =)"

"Vanity... definitely my favorite sin." [The Devil's Advocate]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacek Sieka" <[email protected]>
To: "'Direct Connect developers'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:30 AM
Subject: RE: [dcdev] $Lock NONEXTENDEDPROTOCOLABCABC Pk=

Actually, it's a DC++ bug because the spec clearly states (should anyway)
that the $Lock must _begin_ with EXT*, nothing else...I fixed it locally
anyway, it's up for the next version (which will be the first sporting c-h
extensions)...if someone bases their code on cvs versions
*cough*czdc++*cough*, it's their fault, not mine, as 0.263 doesn't care
about extended hubs =)

/J

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zdenek Stangl
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:02 PM
> To: Direct Connect developers
> Subject: Re: [dcdev] $Lock NONEXTENDEDPROTOCOLABCABC Pk=
>
> Well no offence but It's now DCH++ bug as PtokaX has it fixed
> from version
> 0.326. Im talking about protocol, because the $Supports
> command will be send
> to the latest DC++ if it connects to DCH++ and It will be
> rejected by it. It
> wouldn't be a bug in DC++ without the EXTENDEDPROTOCOL
> substring in the
> $Lock. So now your own hub doesn't support your own client...
> Im here not to nag. Im trying to give a fair note ;)
>
> SurfNet][TropiCo][NL-10Mbit running DCH++ 0.28
> (surfnet.tropico.se:1418)
> $Lock NONEXTENDEDPROTOCOLABCABC Pk=DCHUBPLUSPLUS0.28ABCABC|
>
> pta.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jacek Sieka" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Direct Connect developers'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:49 PM
> Subject: RE: [dcdev] $Lock NONEXTENDEDPROTOCOLABCABC Pk=
>
>
> > Hi...
> > That's a good point...but it's a bug in dc++, so post it in the dc++
> forum,
> > which arguably is better forum for this. I wouldn't be interested in
> reading
> > say...a ptokax specific bug in my mail... =)
> >
> > /J
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zdenek Stangl
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:36 PM
> > > To: Direct Connect developers
> > > Subject: [dcdev] $Lock NONEXTENDEDPROTOCOLABCABC Pk=
> > >
> > > Hi Arne,
> > > plz correct the searching for EXTENDEDPROTOCOL string in
> > > $Lock. PtokaX and
> > > DCH++ both send NONEXTENDEDPROTOCOL string in $Lock and it
> > > wouldn't be nice
> > > to release new DC++ to the wild if it looks for SUB-string in
> > > the Lock. And
> > > there is still about 1000 hubs running ptokax.
> > >
> > > Thanx,
> > > ptaczek.
> > >
> > > --
> > > DC Developers mailinglist
> > > http://3jane.ashpool.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcdev
> > >
> >
> > --
> > DC Developers mailinglist
> > http://3jane.ashpool.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcdev
> >
>
> --
> DC Developers mailinglist
> http://3jane.ashpool.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcdev
>

--
DC Developers mailinglist
http://3jane.ashpool.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dcdev